Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Weeks 35 & 36: US Open, New York (hard) - doubles


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58126
Date:
Weeks 35 & 36: US Open, New York (hard) - doubles


L64:  Dom Inglot & Daniel Nestor (CAN) CR 94 (52+42) vs Mikhail Elgin & Daniil Medvedev (RUS/RUS) CR 482 (77+405)

They'll almost certainly play the top seeds, Peers & Kontinen, if they win that one!

L64:  (4) Jamie Murray & Bruno Soares (BRA) CR 13 (6+7) vs  Julian Knowle & Alexander Peya (AUt/AUT) CR 100 (51+49)

L64:  Guillermo Durán (ARG) & Neal Skupski CR 140 (71+69) vs (2) Lukasz Kubot & Marcelo Melo (POL/BRA) CR 7 (3+4)  bleh



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6109
Date:

If the maths is correct on Live Rankings, then Jamie and Bruno have qualified for the O2 this year (at least one Brit will be there then).

1 ukasz Kubot 35.2 POL1 6830 - +10 US Open R64 - 6910 8820
Marcelo Melo 33.9 BRA1
2 Henri Kontinen 27.1 FIN1 4940 - +10 US Open R64 - 5020 6930
John Peers 29 AUS1
3 Nicolas Mahut 35.5 FRA1 4225 - +10 US Open R64 - 4305 6215
Pierre Hugues Herbert 26.4 FRA2
4 Jamie Murray 31.5 GBR1 3810 - +10 US Open R64 - 3890 5800
Bruno Soares 35.4 BRA2

World Tour Finals Qualification Cut 3755

I guess the ATP will announce these qualifiers post US Open, when Bryan and Bryan may join them. Well done to Jamie and Bruno. Lets hope they go far in NYC.

__________________
JonH


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41026
Date:

I would imagine in practice Jamie & Bruno have already made the 02. But 3755 strikes me as a low official cut-off at this stage.

As you suggest the Bryans at #5 in the race aren't far behind Jamie & Bruno so can overtake them with bits and bobs. Then if I play around with just the winner and runner-up points from the US Open, Shanghai and Paris to pairs #6 to #9 I can get them past Jamie & Bruno too. It may be to do with what these pairs have counting already restricting what they can add net from these tournaments but with #10 and #11 not much further behind #9 I am far from convinced.

Not sure it's worth looking into further though because as I say in practice 3755 points will very probably end up being more than enough whatever.

The ATP are pretty on the ball with these calculations so I will believe pairs have qualified for definite if and when they announce it.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41026
Date:

Oh and by the way the live-tennis.eu site continually suggests R1 losers in doubles mandatories get 10 points. They don't, they get zero. Given they keep having to reverse these for R1 losers ( or at least the ATP end up with 10 less points than these projections ) you would kind of think the message might have got through a long time ago.

So given such as this and other errors they make, if it's just live-tennis.eu that's giving that doubles 02 cut-off, even more reason for doubt.



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6109
Date:

Probably wishful thinking on my behalf!

__________________
JonH


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 13909
Date:

Ken is first alternate with John Millman.

__________________


Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 528
Date:

Time for Jamie and Bruno to demonstrate that doubles rankings aren't fiction and err, umm, win this tournament as 4th seeds.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41026
Date:

Duran & Neal Skupski serve out a long game including saving 4 break points ( isn't Ad fun ?! ) to go set all with (2) Kubot & Melo. The Skupskis of course gave Kubot & Melo a pretty competitive QF at Wimbledon although ultimately 3 straight sets. This best of 3 so one more set needed.

3-6 6-3

Meantime (4) Murray & Soares have levelled their match, having been a break down.

*3-3

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58126
Date:

L64:  (2) Lukasz Kubot & Marcelo Melo (POL/BRA) CR 7 (3+4) defeated Guillermo Durán (ARG) & Neal Skupski CR 140 (71+69) by 3-6 6-3 6-3

I thought they were making a comeback when they broke for *3-3 in the decider... hmm



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58126
Date:

L64:  (4) Jamie Murray & Bruno Soares (BRA) CR 13 (6+7) defeated Julian Knowle & Alexander Peya (AUT/AUT) CR 100 (51+49) by 6-4 7-6(6)



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41026
Date:

Bolelli & Fognini are a decent pair, but beating WC pair Steve Johnson & Tommy Paul 6-0 6-0 ( 51 points to 15, 3 points on return ) in 35 minutes ??!

Steve Johnson I know is not in a great place after his father's death a few months ago and his probably linked lack of form. Still...



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:

Yes, that was an odd score ... especially as I don't particularly think Tommy Paul has a stellar record in doubles play, but Johnson does. Curious.

Very difficult first round draw out of the way for Murray and Soares - and a very decent showing by Mr Skupski and his partner. Wish they could have won!

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 13909
Date:

L64: Mikhail Elgin & Daniil Medvedev (RUS/RUS) CR 482 (77+405) beat Dom Inglot & Daniel Nestor (CAN) CR 94 (52+42) 6-4 7-5

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 58126
Date:

wolf wrote:

Ken is first alternate with John Millman.


Was kind of hoping that Ken & The Milkman would get in for either Kyrgios the Odious & Matt Reid, given the former's shoulder problem & meek surrender to The Milkman in their first round match, or Vasek Pospisil & Nenad Zimonjic, given that the Canadian retired after losing the first set of his first round match to Fernando Verdasco by 2-6, but no such luck with the first (the Aussies actually beat Sousa & Struff in three!) & no sign of a change of personnel yet in the second.  hmm  *pray* 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 55575
Date:

Naomi Broady says in her Radio broadcast that Kyrgios is in fact a really 'nice guy' and a 'big softy'

Just saying.....

__________________
1 2 3 4  >  Last»  | Page of 4  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard