Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 30 - Macedonia F1 ($15,000) - Skopje (clay)


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58115
Date:
Week 30 - Macedonia F1 ($15,000) - Skopje (clay)


L32:  (6) Richard Gabb WR 749 (CH = 410 in October 2013) vs (PR) Dane Propoggia (AUS) WR 1058 (CH = 295 in February 2015)  bleh



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58115
Date:

L16:  (3) Richard Gabb & Darko Jandric (SRB) CR 1724 (1018+706) vs Rrezart Cungu & Tomislav Jotovski (MNE/MKD) CR 2091 (1188+903) 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58115
Date:

L16:  (3) Richard Gabb & Darko Jandric (SRB) CR 1724 (1018+706) defeated Rrezart Cungu & Tomislav Jotovski (MNE/MKD) CR 2091 (1188+903) by 3-6 6-2 [11-9]

*****

QF:  (1) Maximilian Neuchrist & David Pichler (AUT/AUT) CR 461 (179+282) vs (3) Richard Gabb & Darko Jandric (SRB) CR 1724 (1018+706)



__________________


Social player

Status: Offline
Posts: 28
Date:

Are you sure of these results? I was surprised at 1 vs 3 in QF so looked up the drawsheet - it has Cungu + willing - but no score. And the OOP has Cungu+ playing on 26th July.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58115
Date:

janeInScotland wrote:

Are you sure of these results? I was surprised at 1 vs 3 in QF so looked up the drawsheet - it has Cungu + willing - but no score. And the OOP has Cungu+ playing on 26th July.


I probably got things round my neck a bit there, so no, I'm not sure.  The live scoreboard shows Richard & Jandric as having won by the score quoted, though I, too, noticed that their opponents were shown as the victors on the ITF draw sheet without a score.  Didn't know what to make of that & certainly shouldn't have misread it upwards instead of downwards, which would have meant Richard/Jandric vs Grabul/Pavlovic, but I was gagging for my supper...  confuse  I agree that tomorow's OoP shows the opponents vs Grabul/Pavlovic.   That said, wouldn't be the first time that the ITF had screwed up...



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41024
Date:

Super work by the ITF. All that can be said for sure is that something's not right somewhere !

I see that 'results' kept out of it all together



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58115
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:

L16:  (3) Richard Gabb & Darko Jandric (SRB) CR 1724 (1018+706) defeated Rrezart Cungu & Tomislav Jotovski (MNE/MKD) CR 2091 (1188+903) by 3-6 6-2 [11-9]


According to the ATP's PDF, Cungu & Jotovski won by 6-3 2-6 [12-10].  disbelief  bleh



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58115
Date:

L32:  (6) Richard Gabb WR 749 defeated (PR) Dane Propoggia (AUS) WR 1058 by 2 & 4  smile

*****

L16:  (6) Richard Gabb WR 749 vs Manuel Peņa (ARG) WR 974 (= CH)



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19401
Date:

That's another decent win from Rich. Propoggia is a much better player than his ranking as his PR status suggests. As noted by SC at the start of the thread, he has a CH ranking inside the top 300.



-- Edited by Bob in Spain on Wednesday 26th of July 2017 11:01:14 AM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 58115
Date:

L16:  (6) Richard Gabb WR 749 defeated Manuel Peņa (ARG) WR 974 by 4-3 retired

*****

QF:  (6) Richard Gabb WR 749 vs (2) Maximilian Neuchrist (AUT) WR 458 (CH = 310 in August 2013)



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41024
Date:

After winning on a retirement in the last round, Richard has had to retire in his QF after losing the first set and the first two points on his serve in the second set.

I do hope it is nothing serious, I notice he has missed periods of the last year. He has also looked to be in decent form of late.

QF: (6) Richard Gabb WR 749 lost to (2) Maximilian Neuchrist (AUT) WR 458 (CH = 310 in August 2013) 6-1 0-0* 30-0*

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard