Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Leeds United


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17477
Date:
RE: Leeds United


Shhh wrote:

Agreed Bob, we seem to have good 1st choices in these positions so this one has surprised us a bit, he wont be here to sit on the bench!


 No he won't. He wants game time, which is why he has moved on.  Not sure if there is an option to buy in the loan agreement but wherever he plays, he won't let you down.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17477
Date:

As Leif Davis leaves the club to join Ipswich, it seems appropriate to get this classic out one last time.

twitter.com/SportingLifeFC/status/1255081489903112195

Damn, I miss that guy.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17477
Date:

Bob in Spain wrote:
Shhh wrote:
Bob in Spain wrote:


Leeds have made ANOTHER signing. 


I think Leeds are over-compensating for loaning their best player out to Millwall wink


Told you he was a beast. wink


Beast in beast mode today. Good player though he is, not sure anyone would have had him down as the league's top scorer wink



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17477
Date:

New LUFC Away Kit rather dividing opinion on social media right now.

twitter.com/LUFC/status/1554877254127304706



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17477
Date:

I didn't get to see the game today, but apparently neither did the VAR official.

How this isn't a penalty, I'll never know.

twitter.com/El_Loco_Jo/status/1555972827647541248

But three points on the opening day is very welcome.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 36494
Date:

Bob in Spain wrote:

I didn't get to see the game today, but apparently neither did the VAR official.

How this isn't a penalty, I'll never know.

twitter.com/El_Loco_Jo/status/1555972827647541248

But three points on the opening day is very welcome.


 C'mon, he's a goalkeeper. I mean he didn't murder your guy 

In truth I'd love to hear an official explanation of why that wasn't given as a penalty.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17477
Date:

indiana wrote:
Bob in Spain wrote:

I didn't get to see the game today, but apparently neither did the VAR official.

How this isn't a penalty, I'll never know.

twitter.com/El_Loco_Jo/status/1555972827647541248

But three points on the opening day is very welcome.


 C'mon, he's a goalkeeper. I mean he didn't murder your guy 

In truth I'd love to hear an official explanation of why that wasn't given as a penalty.


I will be watching 'ref-watch' with interest tomorrow.



__________________


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 7764
Date:

How did Welbeck not get a penalty yesterday - oh yeah it was at Old Trafford. Oh well, who cares!

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17477
Date:

seagull wrote:

How did Welbeck not get a penalty yesterday - oh yeah it was at Old Trafford. Oh well, who cares!


Spot on. That penalty was equally blatant.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17477
Date:

Ref Watch on Sky:

Brighton/Welbeck incident - unanimous as definite penalty.

Leeds claim - Dermot Gallagher coming up with some weird excuse that historically we don't give fouls by keepers so if we are going to start doing that, we need to announce the keepers will be punished for challenges like that. Never actually said Yes or No to was it a penalty, just that he understood why the ref didn't give it based on historical precident

Everyone one else said stonewall penalty. Stephen Warnock saying if he was a Leeds player, he would be booked for harassing the ref on this one as he would have been apoplectic that it wasn't given.

__________________


Challenger qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2241
Date:

indiana wrote:
Bob in Spain wrote:

I didn't get to see the game today, but apparently neither did the VAR official.

How this isn't a penalty, I'll never know.

twitter.com/El_Loco_Jo/status/1555972827647541248

But three points on the opening day is very welcome.


 C'mon, he's a goalkeeper. I mean he didn't murder your guy 

In truth I'd love to hear an official explanation of why that wasn't given as a penalty.


 The explanation was that it was an unintentional coming together.  Both players looking at the ball and collided.



__________________

 



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17477
Date:

Shhh wrote:
indiana wrote:
Bob in Spain wrote:

I didn't get to see the game today, but apparently neither did the VAR official.

How this isn't a penalty, I'll never know.

twitter.com/El_Loco_Jo/status/1555972827647541248

But three points on the opening day is very welcome.


 C'mon, he's a goalkeeper. I mean he didn't murder your guy 

In truth I'd love to hear an official explanation of why that wasn't given as a penalty.


 The explanation was that it was an unintentional coming together.  Both players looking at the ball and collided.


 https://twitter.com/footballdaily/status/1556593989364715527



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17477
Date:

Shhh wrote:
indiana wrote:
Bob in Spain wrote:

I didn't get to see the game today, but apparently neither did the VAR official.

How this isn't a penalty, I'll never know.

twitter.com/El_Loco_Jo/status/1555972827647541248

But three points on the opening day is very welcome.


 C'mon, he's a goalkeeper. I mean he didn't murder your guy 

In truth I'd love to hear an official explanation of why that wasn't given as a penalty.


 The explanation was that it was an unintentional coming together.  Both players looking at the ball and collided.


If two players in the outfield are both going for the ball and one gets there late taking out the other, that's a foul. Why not the same for goalkeepers ?



__________________


Challenger qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2241
Date:

I'm not sure Bob, but that was the explanation that I read  blankstare



__________________

 



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17477
Date:

Shhh wrote:

I'm not sure Bob, but that was the explanation that I read  blankstare


I think quite a lot of people have put that forward as a defense, but it doesn't work for me. 



__________________
« First  <  Page 62  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard