L16: (1) Wesley Koolhof & Matwé Middelkoop (NED/NED) CR 97 (46+51) vs Ken Skupski & Neal Skupski CR 199 (93+106)
That may not be as bad a draw as it looks: the Dutch boys won their first two encounters (the final of the Brest Challenger in 2015 & the semi-final of the Bangkok 3 Challenger last year), but Ken & Neal won the last one, the first round of the ATP 250 in Sofia earlier this year, so fingers crossed...
QF: (Q) Mathias Bourgue (FRA) WR 158 (CH = 153 last June) vs (4) Aljaz Bedene WR 93
Surely he has a good chance of making the semis at least? The bottom half of the draw has opened up a bit: there he'd face the Belgian eighth seed, Arthur de Greef, or the Italian who put out the second seed, Nicolás Almagro, in the first round & is having a bit of a decent run on the Côte d'Azur...
Good to see Aljaz getting these results recently. I hope he is finding it easier to get on with tournament life after seemingly generally effected by the Davis Cup comings and goings ( and yes, he would have been a natural for this week's clay tie ). He is up to #50 in the live race.
I'm not sure though if he is still fighting the good Davis Cup fight such as trying to take it to CAS ?
Edit : or has he already gone to CAS ? I 'm losing track a bit, but wasn't there an appeal that by its general conclusion wording seemed to be morally on Aljaz's side ( virtually saying that the ITF should maybe have a rethink ) without feeling it could overturn the ITF ruling.
-- Edited by indiana on Thursday 6th of April 2017 07:15:20 PM
The bottom half of the draw has opened up a bit: there [Aljaz would] face the Belgian eighth seed, Arthur de Greef, or the Italian who put out the second seed, Nicolás Almagro, in the first round & is having a bit of a decent run on the Côte d'Azur...
Cecchinato (WR 165/CH 82 in October 2015) is going like a bloody train at the moment: he's just beaten de Greef (WR 125/CH 120 in February) by 3 & 3!
This was the most recent step in the appeal and suggested he still had some more options to pursue if he chose to. As Indy mentioned, the arbitrator hearing his case seemed to conclude that technically the ITF were right but morally they ought to reconsider their position. I don't think anyone else is caught up in this in the same way as Aljaz and so allowing him to play would hardly set any kind of precedent and morally is far more justifiable than for example allowing a known drug cheat to step straight back into the worlds biggest events just because she is a box office draw.