Does this mean that the Skupskis didn't get in ? I know they were travelling down as 1st Alternates.
I'm afraid it looks that way at the moment, Bob. There's certainly no sign of them in the draw I printed off earlier. No "alts", either, however, so it may be worth their while hanging about for another day or two in case pairs start to pull out. For the record, their CR's 182 (91+91).
Can someone explain how the combined ranking works for me here? Why don't the skupskis find themselves in the main draw with a CR of 182, even though Jonny Marray and stakhovsky have a CR of 251?
Can someone explain how the combined ranking works for me here? Why don't the skupskis find themselves in the main draw with a CR of 182, even though Jonny Marray and stakhovsky have a CR of 251?
The combined rankings listed here are the doubles rankings of both players added to each other, but the reason some doubles pairings get in to the MD with a worse CR than some who don't is because they're using singles rankings to get in. Marray has a doubles ranking of 58 and Stakhovsky has a singles ranking of 69, so they used this combined ranking of 58+69=127 to get in to the MD.
Not too confident about the scratch pairing taking on two very accomplished doubles players ... but would love all three pairs to win. Marray and Stakhovsky would be fun to see playing doubles on grass - even on hard, scope for lots of creative play.
Not too confident about the scratch pairing taking on two very accomplished doubles players ... but would love all three pairs to win. Marray and Stakhovsky would be fun to see playing doubles on grass - even on hard, scope for lots of creative play.
Marrero and Cuevas aren't a fully established pairing either so I think it is a winnable match, albeit a far from easy one.
Yes, unfortunately the Skupskis' results ( yes, results, these annoying blighters ) were often a bit disappointing last year, hence their ranking, hence just missing out on the Aussie Open.
Hopefully, they can push on this year and get clearly into Slams.