Could this be one of the most competitive qualifying tournaments of all time to reach a $10k main draw, which in turn is one of the most overly competitive main draws I've ever seen. 4 rounds of matches just to qualify and just look at some of the names.
And the next 2 USA futures events look very similar in terms of the fields.
Was this really worth missing the Aussie Open juniors for Edmund and Bambridge? One of Marsalek and Broady CANNOT even qualify for a $10k tournament.
I know its all about the long game, but this seems a strange decision, albeit all the other relatively highly ranked youngish players from other countries seem to be on the same page too (Kubler, Daniel, Peliwo, etc).
At first glance it does seem a little crazy but I think you said it when you say "about the end game" Aussie take a lot out of their schedules, it may suit to play on clay and, they may be happy just playing amongst this level of competition to set themselves up for the season.
Its really not that stacked. There are some strong players in there but the main draw cut is still reasonable given the paucity of tournaments this week
QR1: (q12) Luke Bambridge WR 796 v Sebastian Acuna (USA) UNR QR1: (q3) Kyle Edmond WR 571 v Mark Oljaca (USA) UNR QR1: Callum Kempe UNR v Daniel Shebshayevich (USA) UNR QR1: (q6) James Marsalek WR 616 v Viju George JR (USA) UNR QR1: (q14) Liam Broady WR 885 v Christopher Rosensteel (USA) UNR
This is one of those monster 128 man qualifying draw and as already mentioned Marsalek and Broady are in the same section.
QR2: (q12) Luke Bambridge WR 796 v Alexios Halebian (USA) WR 1200 by 6-4 2-6 6-3 QR2: (q3) Kyle Edmund WR 571 beat Janis Podzus (LAT) UNR by 3 & 3 QR2: (q6) James Marsalek WR 616 lost to Alexander Ritschard (SUI) WR 1115 by 3 & 2 QR2: (q14) Liam Broady WR 885 beat Henrik Sillanpää (FIN) WR 1086 by 2 & 4
QR3: (q12) Luke Bambridge WR 796 v Bogdan Ursu (ROU) UNR QR3: (q3) Kyle Edmund WR 571 v Alex Rybakov (USA) UNR QR3: (q14) Liam Broady WR 885 v (wc) Jake Devine (USA) UNR
15-year-old Devine got bagelled in the 1st set of his QR2 match but then edged the 2nd set tiebreak 12-10 before taking the 3rd set to win the match.
-- Edited by steven on Sunday 6th of January 2013 01:49:00 AM
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!
^Hopefully because they are being encouraged to look at their careers more holistically and not take a myopic approach.
If they can come away from America with 15+ clay court matches under their belts, I'd be happy.
I look at guys who are making the headlines this week like Bautista Agut and Aljaz Bedene and they are finding their better form at ages 23-24ish. None of our guys are going to be superstars (although I have hopes for Kyle) so this is the sort of mould I hope they could develop into. Much better that than reach top 250 when 21/22 then never seem to progress for the rest of their careers.
-- Edited by Maza1987 on Sunday 6th of January 2013 12:32:48 PM
Bob. Only one of Liam or James could have made it out of qualifying anyway, I guess, so if Liam makes it through its an OK outcome.
I still find this US futures tour a little odd, especially as Oli was also supposed to play (pre injury). I accept that the week 2 tournament was slightly stacked due to lack of available tournaments, but if Anything, week 3 and 4 look much tougher, pre the last minute withdrawal run. Even Oli at about 450 was outside the cut for MD!
As it stands, looks like the boys need to win 6 matches each week, just to gain 2 points, against above average futures fields. 4 QD and 2MD matches. Why would James (or Oli) choose to put themselves through this? Perhaps its simply to force them down the warm weather clay court route, which has traditionally been a GB weakness, but I still think the odds of any of them picking up big points are small. Hope I'm wrong, but you cant accuse anyone of cherry picking easy futures events!
^Hopefully because they are being encouraged to look at their careers more holistically and not take a myopic approach.
If they can come away from America with 15+ clay court matches under their belts, I'd be happy.
I look at guys who are making the headlines this week like Bautista Agut and Aljaz Bedene and they are finding their better form at ages 23-24ish. None of our guys are going to be superstars (although I have hopes for Kyle) so this is the sort of mould I hope they could develop into. Much better that than reach top 250 when 21/22 then never seem to progress for the rest of their careers.
I agree that at this stage of their career, and at this time of the year, getting lots of competitive matches under their belts is a good strategy. If you look at our players in recent years who have focussed on home futures and other relatively weak events it has helped their ranking but their long term development has suffered.
Actually Balleret beat a fellow Monagesque (have I spelt that correctly?), which makes it all even more improbable - suspect there can't be too many professional players from Monaco!!
update: Monégasque, sorry!
-- Edited by korriban on Monday 7th of January 2013 06:35:00 PM
FQR: (q12) Luke Bambridge WR 796 lost to (q2) Jose Hernandez (DOM) WR 561 2-6 4-6 FQR: (q3) Kyle Edmund WR 571 beat (q9) Romain Arneodo (FRA) WR 718 6-2 7-5 FQR: (q14) Liam Broady WR 885 lost to Spencer Papa (USA) UNR 4-6 3-6. [Very sorry - I was wrong about Liam]
L32: Kyle Edmund WR 571 vs Daniel Garza (MEX) 401
A win would likely see Kyle up against the Romanian #3 seed, ranked 276! This is a tough ask for just 1 or perhaps 2 points, but Kyle hasn't dropped a set yet, and with a day's rest.....who knows.......
-- Edited by korriban on Monday 7th of January 2013 09:33:32 PM