Seeing the Sunday Times headlines about 150 sports stars doping via the doctor, I see tennis players get mentioned. I just cant see British ones being included though? I would be staggered if any of our recent top 100 players have gone that route and, I dont see those outside the top 100 being of the level required to look at that route.
I think doping in the nature of what Sharapova is accused of is rife in sport but, when it comes to British tennis players......I just cant see it! Head in sand?
What amazed me is that he was reported and investigated by UKAD in 2014, who basically said that they "could not act", as the doctor was not affiliated to any particular sport and therefore outside their jurisdiction.
Shocking what a mess WADA have made of this - though I imagine there'd have been far more of an outcry in the first place about so many people were suddenly getting caught if they hadn't mainly been from Russia/Eastern Europe and hence automatically assumed to be guilty by many people. Of course, Russia had dug its own pit in that regard but that doesn't automatically mean a lower standard of proof should be required against individual Russian athletes than against those from any other countries.
I don't think WADA is ever going to be able to get a grip on drugs (i.e. catch the biggest cheats instead of just catching the careless or creating lots of very grey areas by rushing in without proper research, as in this case) without funding that is more commensurate with the amounts of money swishing around in the sports they are trying to regulate. It's a bit ironic that their incompetence makes the case for them needing more resources, but there you go - they must have a thankless task at the moment.
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!
Didn't Sharapova say they missed the email or whatever so I had assumed in her case she was saying that she has CONTINUED to take meldonium after the date it became banned and was caught because of that.
Not sure if she actually clearly said though that she had continued to take it - anyone ?? If so the 'still in system' from last year defense doesn't apply to her.
-- Edited by indiana on Wednesday 13th of April 2016 09:38:32 PM
WADA face an uphill battle, given the vested interests of numerous powerful organisations and individuals in controlling the consequences of positive tests for the performance enhancing drug meldonium. To be fare to WADA it has taken some time for a convincing mitigating argument to be presented and I wouldn't be at all surprised if a number of talented experts have been working on putting it together with a view to establishing reasonable doubt.
Understanding how a drug is metabolised and the way in which that metabolism can be altered by the genetics of any said indivual is less than straight forward.
Each week patients walk into A and E's across the country because the drug they are taking for medical reasons is either too effective or not effective enough because something has impacted the way their body is metabolising it. Warfarin being a good example too effective you bleed not effective enough you clot (prevention of which is why you take it in the first place)
I feel one has to be measured the agenda is keeping the playing field as clean and level as possible whilst also protecting athletes hurting themselves and of course the sport. We are learning more about meldonium, only a fool would use it in the future and of course we have learnt a lot about Maria and the moral position of the companies that supported her. Facts on which we can all take a position. No Head kit in my bag this summer.
-- Edited by Oakland2002 on Wednesday 13th of April 2016 10:02:00 PM
-- Edited by Oakland2002 on Wednesday 13th of April 2016 10:02:38 PM
Didn't Sharapova say they missed the email or whatever so I had assumed in her case she was saying that she has CONTINUED to take meldonium after the date it became banned and was caught because of that.
Not sure if she actually clearly said though that she had continued to take it - anyone ?? If so the 'still in system' from last year defense doesn't apply to her.
-- Edited by indiana on Wednesday 13th of April 2016 09:38:32 PM
This is my understanding too.......she must be kicking herself for trying 'to take ownership' of the issue, calling the press conference and trying to garner public sympathy by blaming on an oversight by a busy woman........
Maria really has made a botch of this whole thing in various ways. Being reported that the 2012 flag carrier will almost certainly at least miss the Olympics due to her 'admission'.
-- Edited by indiana on Thursday 14th of April 2016 12:23:10 PM
It's now a week since Sharapova graced the ITF with an interview and informed them of her decision in their case. I'm beginning to wonder how long it will take her PR to source an appropriate venue for her to announce this decision to the wider world.
The WTA's attitude is getting increasingly perturbing.
Rather than implementing a respectful moratorium on their usual Sharapova puff PR operation, they are instead finding any excuse to include Ms. Sharapova in 'News' stories, multiple times a week.
The latest example is an ESPN list of famous sports people (8 of 100 are women - a depressingly low number, but that's another kettle of fish altogether, for another time! - half of those 8 are WTA players).
Sharapova is, admittedly, the highest ranked female in the list, but the list also includes, both of the Williamses, and Mirza.
So, they lead with a glossy PR photo of a smiling Sharapova, and a gushing report of her millions of social media fans, many lucrative contracts, personal fortune and 'popular' confectionery range.
Mention of her current 'sabbatical' is conspicuously absent.
Very surprised that the WTA are just going to ride this out with Maria hiding in plain sight.
Bizarre when their remit has to be showing leadership in generating an environment in which the natural thing for all little girls to do is play tennis in the way in which the AYSO makes it natural for girls to play soccer in the USA. To do this the sport and the associations that run the professional game have to do all they can to stay clean.
Fascinating. So I interpret that as any player who is not playing for any reason could be serving a suspension following a positive test awaiting the results of a formal investigation.