Recently being inside the top 250 by the time Queens came around made you eligible for a Wimbledon WC (though didn't mean it was automatic by any means). Regardless of whether it leads to the valuable WC or not, top 250 by then would be a decent goal for a few of our players.
Interestingly enough, several players have the bulk of their points in the 2nd half of the season though whereas this represents an excellent oppotunity to be at a decent score by then, it also flags up that many do not like whats on offer any where near as much the fitrst few months.
Top 250 cut off seems to be between 190-195pts. Allowing for the larger target as a safeguard, the following players require the following amount of points to get there. Seems achievable?
Jamie Baker - 42pts required
Josh Goodall - 49pts required
Alex Bogdanovic - 96pts required
(NB James Ward should make the cut regardless and Boggo would probably have to go a lot higher than 250 before being considered. Dan Evans has probably too many points in the first half of the season to have even an outside chance......but I'd love to be proved wrong!)
-- Edited by Shhh on Monday 19th of December 2011 07:24:29 AM
While I certainly agree your general analysis re the top 250 chances I don't see :
Shhh wrote:
...it also flags up that many do not like whats on offer any where near as much the fitrst few months.
What the points in the two halves of the year flag up to me with regards to the dramatic differences for Jamie and Josh is just how much better they were playing in the second half of the year compared to the first half, a fact confirmed by looking at Jamies's much improved challenger results and Josh's much improved ( mainly British ) futures results compared to generally disappointing first halves.
Some other folk like Evo ( as you referred to ) and Chris Eaton had more points in their first half of the year ( if not quite as marked a difference ), again to me due to them just not producing the goods so much in the second half of the year compared to the first.
Certainly the clay is more prominent in the first half of the year and I think theres a little less on offer for home tournaments, and indeed Europe in general. Not all players scored more in the 2nd half than the first but I would guess that if a broad average was worked out, the latter would shave it as far as ponts won. Its only a guess mind, not scientifically worked out and meant to be stated as a cast iron fact. Just conversation whilst nothing else is happening
Certainly the clay is more prominent in the first half of the year and I think theres a little less on offer for home tournaments, and indeed Europe in general. Not all players scored more in the 2nd half than the first but I would guess that if a broad average was worked out, the latter would shave it as far as ponts won. Its only a guess mind, not scientifically worked out and meant to be stated as a cast iron fact. Just conversation whilst nothing else is happening
This year was particularly extreme, I think (17/21 singles titles were won in the second half of the year), but my impression over the years I have been doing the GB top 25 tables is that the majority of the GB men tend to pick up a lot more ranking points in the second half of the year than in the first, all other things (injuries, etc) being equal.
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!