Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: grass season wcs


administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 18307
Date:
grass season wcs


its the regular debate but who should get them this year ?  

bit more competitive on the womens side especially for the birmingham and eastbourne ones - are there only 3 for both those tournaments ?

My choices would be:

Birmingham:   Keothavong, O'Brien, South

Eastbourne:  Keothavong, O'Brien, Baltacha

Wimbledon:  (assuming Anne K gets in direct):   O'Brien, Baltacha, South, Cavaday, Sarah B  (has disappointed at times in the singles but has the big game to cause an upset),  Amanda Elliott

 

__________________


Social player

Status: Offline
Posts: 27
Date:

its funny how Naomi is much younger, has achieved more than any of the others had by her age, has beaten katie recently, has much more talent, a bigger game, and isn't far off them in rankings, and still doesn't get the opportunities that they get, and have had, for years???

this isn't a dig at your projections Sheddie, as I think that is pretty much how it is going to go. but it does baffle me, because ok so anne makes top 100... then what? its not turning her into a player of the future, it is just getting her to the top hundred.... really there is not much difference in standard between 95 and 120. the only reason the LTA will give her all 3 wild cards (again) will be to get her to 100, which will make them look good. i'm sorry but anne had her chances and then some. katie doesn't deserve chances over naomi, bally or mel, but she will get them because if she doesn't she will almost definitly lose her points and the LTA will look bad once again.

i'm not saying they should start giving the wild cards to 16 year olds.... but if its between a 19 year old who can do something big, or a 24 year old who has had every chance under the sun and not achieved anything... it seems obvious. i guess it just depends what their priorities are.

__________________


Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 457
Date:

There will only be 2 WCs for Eastbourne.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10013
Date:

Birmingham -

Keothavong
Cavaday
Baltacha


Eastbourne -

O'Brien
South



Wimbledon -

Cavaday
Baltacha
O'Brien
South
Fitzpatrick
Elliott
Stoop
Play off

Wimbledon qualies -

Borwell
Broady
Curtis
Moore
Jennifer Ren
Rae
Clarke
Play off



Of course, there's no way that'll happen.


__________________

  



Admin:Moderator + All Time Great + britishtennis.net correspondant

Status: Offline
Posts: 11280
Date:

Elliot must be shoe in for at least one of these main draws !

__________________

BTnet logo



County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 852
Date:

They don't do the play-off anymore do they? *sadface*

Anne's got a feed-up into s'Hertogenbosch! *happyface* and direct entry to Wimby *happier face*

__________________

Power Shot!



Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 722
Date:

So you think that Anne will get a W/c for Birmingham and then will either have to qualify for Eastbourne or take the feed up. Maybe she could get in on Da, too?

__________________
Anne Keothavong - Heather Watson - Naomi Cavaday - Laura Robson - Elena Baltacha - Everyone else!


Masters Series Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 3790
Date:

To some extent I agree with Jimmy but then again you havw to give credit to Anne for what shes achived in the past 12 months. I also think you have to spread the WC's around. Now that we have a gorup of decent players for WC's i think we can do that.

My choices would be

brum

MD WC's
Naomi
Mel
Bally

Im tempeted to put Anne and Katie in qualifying as they are alreayd there

Q
Amanda
Georgie
Anna F
Sarah B

Based on last year a few of our other players might get in on their ranking.

Eastbourne

MD
Naomi
Mel/Katie

I think Anne and Bally have had too many WC's into the MD here. I'd like Anne to go to the Ordina Open now she has a SE there and is more likley to win a match there.

Q
Bally
Amanda
Georgie
Anna F

I think Amanda isn't quite reayd for MD WCs, maybe next year.

Wimbledon

MD
Anne is now in DA

WC's to
Katie
Bally
Mel
Naomi

I don;t think more than 6 should be given to brits. If Anne needed one i would have found the top5 perfectly acceptable. But i dont think amny other brit is ready for MD/or isn;t in the ebst of from

Q
Sarah B
Anna F
Amanda
Georgie
Anna Smith- Is she in good enough form?

Or do you throw in Jade C, Naomi B, Katerina B, Yasmin?

__________________

Good luck Team GBR in 2016!!!



administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 18307
Date:

I'm pretty sure that Anne will get a wc for Birmingham after her results this yr.....I doubt her ranking will be quite high enough to get in direct, not 100% on that tho ?

would have thought she'd take the feed-up, Eastbourne is extremely strong so she'd definately need a wc there and the chance of winning matches would be greater in Holland

I think Amanda E should get a Wimbledon wc and qualies wcs for the other two wtas definately

don't think Anna F has been consistent enough year-round to deserve a main draw wimbledon wc.....maybe Georgie Stoop, she was close to top 250 before the injury last year



__________________


administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 18307
Date:

next target for Anne will be top 75, if she gets there then the LTA will fund her to have a full-time personal travelling coach

__________________


County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 852
Date:

Eastbourne cut-off for qualies is ludicrously high every year. It's a 28-draw rather than a 32 isn't it? Never quite understood that, and as the biggest women's grass-court event outside of Wimbledon, it's jam-packed every year. I think one year, the top seed in qualies was Molik or Serna when they were ranked 26 at the time!!!! MADNESS!

-- Edited by Silver at 00:00, 2008-05-11

__________________

Power Shot!



Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 18077
Date:

One thing to consider when handing out wild cards is who is on form. This table lists all those who have improved their rankings this year. It gives the greatest percentage improvements in rankings since. Moves from 1001 to 501 or 201 to 101 would both count as 50% improvements. The numbers in the table give the percentage rise, the ranking at the end of last year, the latest ranking and the actual rise since the end of last year. Newcomers Jocelyn Rae, Stephanie Cornish, Amy Sargeant and Jennifer Ren have been given a nominal ranking of 1100 at the end of last year so they can be included in the improvements table.

Order % 2007 Latest Change Names
1 __ 38% 640 __ 398 __ +242 _ Amanda Elliott
2 __ 28% 214 __ 155 __ +59 __ Melanie South
3 __ 24% 187 __ 142 __ +45 __ Elena Baltacha
4 __ 21% 132 __ 104 __ +28 __ Anne Keothavong
5 __ 18% 811 __ 668 __ +143 _ Yasmin Clarke
6 __ 17% 1100 _ 913 __ +187 _ Jocelyn Rae
7 __ 12% 1100 _ 968 __ +132 _ Stephanie Cornish
8 __ 11% 723 __ 641 __ +82 __ Naomi Broady
9 __ 10% 653 __ 588 __ +65 __ Katharina Brown
10 _ 10% 358 __ 323 __ +35 __ Anna Fitzpatrick
11 _ 10% 867 __ 783 __ +84 __ Amanda Carreras
12 __ 5% 709 __ 674 __ +35 __ Olivia Scarfi
13 _ _4% 127 __ 122 __ +5 ___ Katie OBrien
14 __ 3% 1100 _ 1063 _ +37 __ Amy Sargeant
15 __ 3% 1100 _ 1063 _ +37 __ Jennifer Ren
16 __ 3% 1055 _ 1024 _ +31 __ Nicola Mooney
17 __ 1% 526 __ 521 __ +5 ___ Jade Curtis
18 __ 0% 1026 _ 1024 _ +2 ___ Lucy Warburton

Georgie Stoop has only recently come back from injury so is still on a lower ranking than last year. Naomi Cavaday is surprisingly 6 places lower now than at the end of last year.

__________________


Masters Series Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 3790
Date:

But the year Serna was #1 seed. Amanda Janes beat her, then qualified and won a MD match.

__________________

Good luck Team GBR in 2016!!!



Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2095
Date:

Birmingham:

MD:
1. Anne K
2. Mel
3. Bally

Because I want to give Katie the Eastbourne MD WC, I'd give Mel this one.

Q:
1. Katie
2. Naomi
3. Sarah
4. Amanda

Eastbourne:

MD:
1. Bally
2. Katie

Bally and Katie both won through qualies last year so should be rewarded. Anne should go to the Netherlands

Q:
1. Mel
2. Naomi
3. Amanda
4. Georgie

Amanda really deserves a lot of opportunities as she has really stepped up this year. I'd love to see Georgie do well, and Sarah has never made an impact at Eastbourne so went for the younger player.

Wimbledon:

MD:
(D.A. Anne)
1. Katie
2. Bally
3. Mel
4. Naomi
5. Amanda
6. Sarah

Q:
1. Georgie
2. Anna F
3. Katharina
4. Anna S (if her form picks up)
5. Jade/ Naomi B/ Yasmin
6. Jade/ Naomi B/ Yasmin

__________________

 



Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 731
Date:

am i not correct in thinking that in wimbledon only 4 wildcards go to brits in main draw as rest go to players of other various nationalities???? i thinkn thats usually the case otherwise wouldnt be fair.
anyway my choices are:
birmingham main draw
anne k
mel

qualies
sarah
katie
amanda
anna smith

eastbourne = anne to netherlands
katie
bally

qualies
fitz
cavaday
sarah
mel

wimbledon
anne is in!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
bally
katie
amanda
cavaday

qualies
sarah if not already in??
anna smith
fitz
windley
stoop
broady

grean leaf put ren in qualies for wimbledon but i think she is too young an would get killed. smith is really good on grass so hence my choice. i want amanda to get main draw one as she constantly surprises me with wins over much higher oposition so thats why i picked her. cavaday mel sarah and katie all deserve to be in main if there is space. windley beats some good people and she beat rae which made the choice between them. fitz form is horrible and broady is always worth a shout!



my doubles choices would be
anna hawkins
sarah borwell
anna fitzpatrick
mel south
katie obrien
amanda elliott
liz thomas
jade curtis
they have all done well in doubles and hawkins is dubs specialist! liz thomas and curtis would make a good team i think

__________________
1 2 3  >  Last»  | Page of 3  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard