its the regular debate but who should get them this year ?
bit more competitive on the womens side especially for the birmingham and eastbourne ones - are there only 3 for both those tournaments ?
My choices would be:
Birmingham: Keothavong, O'Brien, South
Eastbourne: Keothavong, O'Brien, Baltacha
Wimbledon: (assuming Anne K gets in direct): O'Brien, Baltacha, South, Cavaday, Sarah B (has disappointed at times in the singles but has the big game to cause an upset), Amanda Elliott
its funny how Naomi is much younger, has achieved more than any of the others had by her age, has beaten katie recently, has much more talent, a bigger game, and isn't far off them in rankings, and still doesn't get the opportunities that they get, and have had, for years???
this isn't a dig at your projections Sheddie, as I think that is pretty much how it is going to go. but it does baffle me, because ok so anne makes top 100... then what? its not turning her into a player of the future, it is just getting her to the top hundred.... really there is not much difference in standard between 95 and 120. the only reason the LTA will give her all 3 wild cards (again) will be to get her to 100, which will make them look good. i'm sorry but anne had her chances and then some. katie doesn't deserve chances over naomi, bally or mel, but she will get them because if she doesn't she will almost definitly lose her points and the LTA will look bad once again.
i'm not saying they should start giving the wild cards to 16 year olds.... but if its between a 19 year old who can do something big, or a 24 year old who has had every chance under the sun and not achieved anything... it seems obvious. i guess it just depends what their priorities are.
So you think that Anne will get a W/c for Birmingham and then will either have to qualify for Eastbourne or take the feed up. Maybe she could get in on Da, too?
__________________
Anne Keothavong - Heather Watson - Naomi Cavaday - Laura Robson - Elena Baltacha - Everyone else!
To some extent I agree with Jimmy but then again you havw to give credit to Anne for what shes achived in the past 12 months. I also think you have to spread the WC's around. Now that we have a gorup of decent players for WC's i think we can do that.
My choices would be
brum
MD WC's Naomi Mel Bally
Im tempeted to put Anne and Katie in qualifying as they are alreayd there
Q Amanda Georgie Anna F Sarah B
Based on last year a few of our other players might get in on their ranking.
Eastbourne
MD Naomi Mel/Katie
I think Anne and Bally have had too many WC's into the MD here. I'd like Anne to go to the Ordina Open now she has a SE there and is more likley to win a match there.
Q Bally Amanda Georgie Anna F
I think Amanda isn't quite reayd for MD WCs, maybe next year.
Wimbledon
MD Anne is now in DA
WC's to Katie Bally Mel Naomi
I don;t think more than 6 should be given to brits. If Anne needed one i would have found the top5 perfectly acceptable. But i dont think amny other brit is ready for MD/or isn;t in the ebst of from
Q Sarah B Anna F Amanda Georgie Anna Smith- Is she in good enough form?
Or do you throw in Jade C, Naomi B, Katerina B, Yasmin?
I'm pretty sure that Anne will get a wc for Birmingham after her results this yr.....I doubt her ranking will be quite high enough to get in direct, not 100% on that tho ?
would have thought she'd take the feed-up, Eastbourne is extremely strong so she'd definately need a wc there and the chance of winning matches would be greater in Holland
I think Amanda E should get a Wimbledon wc and qualies wcs for the other two wtas definately
don't think Anna F has been consistent enough year-round to deserve a main draw wimbledon wc.....maybe Georgie Stoop, she was close to top 250 before the injury last year
Eastbourne cut-off for qualies is ludicrously high every year. It's a 28-draw rather than a 32 isn't it? Never quite understood that, and as the biggest women's grass-court event outside of Wimbledon, it's jam-packed every year. I think one year, the top seed in qualies was Molik or Serna when they were ranked 26 at the time!!!! MADNESS!
One thing to consider when handing out wild cards is who is on form. This table lists all those who have improved their rankings this year. It gives the greatest percentage improvements in rankings since. Moves from 1001 to 501 or 201 to 101 would both count as 50% improvements. The numbers in the table give the percentage rise, the ranking at the end of last year, the latest ranking and the actual rise since the end of last year. Newcomers Jocelyn Rae, Stephanie Cornish, Amy Sargeant and Jennifer Ren have been given a nominal ranking of 1100 at the end of last year so they can be included in the improvements table.
Georgie Stoop has only recently come back from injury so is still on a lower ranking than last year. Naomi Cavaday is surprisingly 6 places lower now than at the end of last year.
Because I want to give Katie the Eastbourne MD WC, I'd give Mel this one.
Q: 1. Katie 2. Naomi 3. Sarah 4. Amanda
Eastbourne:
MD: 1. Bally 2. Katie
Bally and Katie both won through qualies last year so should be rewarded. Anne should go to the Netherlands
Q: 1. Mel 2. Naomi 3. Amanda 4. Georgie
Amanda really deserves a lot of opportunities as she has really stepped up this year. I'd love to see Georgie do well, and Sarah has never made an impact at Eastbourne so went for the younger player.
am i not correct in thinking that in wimbledon only 4 wildcards go to brits in main draw as rest go to players of other various nationalities???? i thinkn thats usually the case otherwise wouldnt be fair. anyway my choices are: birmingham main draw anne k mel
qualies sarah katie amanda anna smith
eastbourne = anne to netherlands katie bally
qualies fitz cavaday sarah mel
wimbledon anne is in!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! bally katie amanda cavaday
qualies sarah if not already in?? anna smith fitz windley stoop broady
grean leaf put ren in qualies for wimbledon but i think she is too young an would get killed. smith is really good on grass so hence my choice. i want amanda to get main draw one as she constantly surprises me with wins over much higher oposition so thats why i picked her. cavaday mel sarah and katie all deserve to be in main if there is space. windley beats some good people and she beat rae which made the choice between them. fitz form is horrible and broady is always worth a shout!
my doubles choices would be anna hawkins sarah borwell anna fitzpatrick mel south katie obrien amanda elliott liz thomas jade curtis they have all done well in doubles and hawkins is dubs specialist! liz thomas and curtis would make a good team i think