Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 42 - ITF ($25K) - Obidos, Portugal Carpet


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5110
Date:
Week 42 - ITF ($25K) - Obidos, Portugal Carpet


Relatively straightforward first set , 6-2 1-0*

__________________

Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.



All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

and second even more so, Katie wins 6-2 6-0 smile



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

R2: BOULTER, Katie (GBR) 5 224 beat MARFUTINA, Maria (RUS) Q 512 (CH=354 9/5/16) 6-0 7-5
R2: SWAN, Katie (GBR) 355 beat CENGIZ, Berfu (TUR) Q 506 6-2 6-0

QF: BOULTER, Katie (GBR) 5 224 vs KUZMOVA, Viktoria (SVK) 1 130=CH 19yrs (JCH=24 Jan 16)
QF: SWAN, Katie (GBR) 355 vs KALINSKAYA, Anna (RUS) 2 171 (CH:127 June 17) 18 yrs (JCH:3 Feb 16)

The two toughest QF matches next for the Katie's against two excellent junior players.cry



-- Edited by Michael D on Friday 20th of October 2017 05:32:11 PM

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5110
Date:

Well done the Katies.
Each will do well to progress any further.

__________________

Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.



All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5110
Date:

R16: Silva/Spiteri (GBR/ITA) lost to Burillo Escorihuella/Parres Azcoitia (ESP/ESP) 2-6 4-6

__________________

Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.



Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 39469
Date:

Well done to the Katies. I was already beginning to wonder if a few things were clicking more for Katie S so I will be particularly interested to see how competitive her QF is.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5110
Date:

First set of the Semi-final to Tara & Amra, over the second seeds, 6-4

__________________

Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.



Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 39469
Date:

blob wrote:

First set of the Semi-final to Tara & Amra, over the second seeds, 6-4


 ... over in the US 



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5110
Date:

indiana wrote:
blob wrote:

First set of the Semi-final to Tara & Amra, over the second seeds, 6-4


 ... over in the US 


Erm... Yes. Attention to detail , and all that



__________________

Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.



Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 152
Date:

Michael D wrote:

R2: BOULTER, Katie (GBR) 5 224 beat MARFUTINA, Maria (RUS) Q 512 (CH=354 9/5/16) 6-0 7-5
R2: SWAN, Katie (GBR) 355 beat CENGIZ, Berfu (TUR) Q 506 6-2 6-0

QF: BOULTER, Katie (GBR) 5 224 vs KUZMOVA, Viktoria (SVK) 1 130=CH 19yrs (JCH=24 Jan 16)
QF: SWAN, Katie (GBR) 355 vs KALINSKAYA, Anna (RUS) 2 171 (CH:127 June 17) 18 yrs (JCH:3 Feb 16)

The two toughest QF matches next for the Katie's against two excellent junior players.cry



-- Edited by Michael D on Friday 20th of October 2017 05:32:11 PM


Although both are older than Katie S. 



__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4585
Date:

Are both the quarters and semis being played tomorrow?

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 39469
Date:

Jaggy1876 wrote:

Are both the quarters and semis being played tomorrow?


According to tomorrow's order of play, no.

It's singles QFs and doubles QFs and SFs, which could still mean 3 matches for Katie S.



__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4585
Date:

So one match really then for Katie S and Katie B.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6336
Date:

If KS wins all her matches she will play 3 today - SQF, DQF and DSF.

and 3 tomorrow SSF, SF and DF. no



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5110
Date:

Early stages for both Katies
Swan 3-2*
Boulter 2-2*

__________________

Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.

«First  <  1 2 3 4 5 6  >  Last»  | Page of 6  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard