Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 25 Womens Wimbledon Qualifying Wildcard playoffs.


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 52413
Date:
Week 25 Womens Wimbledon Qualifying Wildcard playoffs.


Hi, telstar.

You make interesting points. And, although I am a huge fan of junior tennis, I agree. There is zero respect for older, established players - it's always the next 'hot' star.

The trouble is, I feel, that each coach pushes their own player's credentials for a place. And those players whose coaches are 'in the know' within the LTA system always 'win'.

Katie Boulter got the Q WC place last year, despite losing in the semis of the wildcard play-offs, and despite Sam Murray having a FAR better claim, simply because Jeremy Bates' word has some clout.

Despite that, many will be interested to see how the youngsters do.

Maybe it's the balance. Six wildcards seems a lot. I know that two (or up to two) are taken up by the Tour leader/winner. But maybe there should only be two other ones, not four.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 52413
Date:

the addict wrote:

First set of results in - and some surprises....

Ali Collins def Emily Webley-Smith [1/519] 6-4 7-6(4)
Mollie Crouch def Beth Grey 5-7 6-4 6-4
Alicia Barnett def Eliz Maloney 6-4 3-6 7-5
Maia Lumsden [4/688] def Emily Appleton 6-3 4-6 6-3


 

There's a pay-cheque of £4,375 for the winner of that four.

It's a big prize.....



__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1812
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:
the addict wrote:

First set of results in - and some surprises....

Ali Collins def Emily Webley-Smith [1/519] 6-4 7-6(4)
Mollie Crouch def Beth Grey 5-7 6-4 6-4
Alicia Barnett def Eliz Maloney 6-4 3-6 7-5
Maia Lumsden [4/688] def Emily Appleton 6-3 4-6 6-3


 

There's a pay-cheque of £4,375 for the winner of that four.

It's a big prize.....


What a result from Ali Collins I thought she might surprise Emily. Ali is highly thought of in Scotland. My tip is Maia though to qualify  



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 52413
Date:

Nik Slater (more Scottish tennis ) has been posting photos of her and Ali in training for this event.

I was more surprised that Mollie had beaten Beth. But Beth seems to have had a little run of surprising losses (and close ones at that).

Mind you, all the matches were pretty/very close.

Maia is the best ranked player left so she should certainly be favourite.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

telstar wrote:

I'm new to posting but a long-standing follower of this board and of British womens' tennis. I don't share the general agreement with the players accepted for the wild card comp. For regular adult players this is a high light of their year and a rare opportunity to see a possible path to glory! Wimbledon is not a junior event and therefore wild cards should not be given to junior players who have not played senior tennis. The three girls given wild cards without world ranking points have had opportunities to play senior events but have instead chosen to proceed along the Junior ITF route. This may well be the correct decision for them but by giving wild cards to such juniors then regular senior players are being deprived. An example is Manisha Foster who has been injured but still has a world ranking and yet is made a reserve for this event. Generally there is bias against older players in the granting of wild cards by the LTA. This is also shown in British ITF events when juniors are always prioritised over seniors. The treatment of Sam Murray, Tara Moore and Emily Webley-Smith in recent years has also been poor. Players who continue full time after leaving the juniors should be encouraged-it's a tough enough life for them as it is without bias being displayed against them!


 

-- Edited by telstar on Thursday 22nd of June 2017 02:59:15 PM


 I have been wondering where Manisha was, who hasn't participated in a single grass court event this year unfortunately. I agree she should have been given an entry here... but perhaps more importantly she is one of the many who would have potentially benefited from having a number of 25k tournaments as well both to help adapt to the grass, and as opportunity for lower ranked players to show more easily who has potential on grass. 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10059
Date:

Devastated for Em, but really not a surprise. Ali is a talent, and Em hasn't managed to maintain the form that saw her so successful in February/March.

Given she got nothing in doubles last year, suspect there will be nothing coming this year either.

Sad times.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 39458
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:

Hi, telstar.

You make interesting points. And, although I am a huge fan of junior tennis, I agree. There is zero respect for older, established players - it's always the next 'hot' star.

The trouble is, I feel, that each coach pushes their own player's credentials for a place. And those players whose coaches are 'in the know' within the LTA system always 'win'.

Katie Boulter got the Q WC place last year, despite losing in the semis of the wildcard play-offs, and despite Sam Murray having a FAR better claim, simply because Jeremy Bates' word has some clout.

Despite that, many will be interested to see how the youngsters do.

Maybe it's the balance. Six wildcards seems a lot. I know that two (or up to two) are taken up by the Tour leader/winner. But maybe there should only be two other ones, not four.


 

Yes, I think most folk on the forum would agree that there appears to be fairly intolerable bias against older players - Sam Murray's treatment last year re a non Wimbledon Q WC being the worst single example. But EWS has had it tough when she had kept going so much longer than most Brits and hasn't tended to get close to a level playing field as any reward. Maybe now becoming too late for her - that should fire her up !

Not sure that the Q WC play-off WC ( phew ! ) situation is too bad though. The 10 direct entries have covered all our top 1000 players that wanted to play ( the men's direct entries go even deeper ) though I take the point that the first reserve on ranking Manisha had a very good case for being considered along with the young crew. I quite like the young ones having their chance here, but I don't like that it simply seems policy year on year that the 4 open WCs are given to young prospects. Older players may have particular cases like this year the not very old at all Manisha.



__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4585
Date:

Not really sad times, Emily gained a QWC in 2015 when losing in the play offs. Can't see any justification at all for Doubles WC either. She's had her fill through the years.

Wild Cards need to go to players who have a realistic chance of competing with top 200 players.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 52413
Date:

Wins for:

Eden Silva (v Emma Rad.)
Fran Jones (v Emily Arb)
Jodie B (v Laura D)
Olivia Nicholls (v Sam Murray)

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 20153
Date:

For the record
Eden Silva [2/594] def Emma Raducanu 6-2 6-4
Francesca Jones def Emily Arbuthnott 6-4 6-3
Jodie Burrage def Laura Deigman 7-6(8) 2-6 6-1
Olivia Nicholls def Samantha Murray [3/679] 6-1 1-6 6-1

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10059
Date:

Woah, Sam lost. Great opportunity for the 4 girls remaining

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 52413
Date:

Interesting (in a way) that three of the women's wildcards came through the first round.

But none of the men's wildcards did.

__________________


Intermediate Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 256
Date:

Good for Emma to be given a shot. Did well in the second set.

__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4585
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:

Interesting (in a way) that three of the women's wildcards came through the first round.

But none of the men's wildcards did.


 I'd attribute that to the fact that the womens side looks like it has some decent juniors coming though whereas only really Jay on the men's side looks likely of becoming a top player.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 52413
Date:

Jaggy1876 wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:

Interesting (in a way) that three of the women's wildcards came through the first round.

But none of the men's wildcards did.


 I'd attribute that to the fact that the womens side looks like it has some decent juniors coming though whereas only really Jay on the men's side looks likely of becoming a top player.


 

Yes and no.

Jay is no longer a junior (born 1998). Anton Matusevich and Jack Draper are extremely promising in terms of their profiles. Anton very nearly won today. (Jack is carving up the G1 Juniors event in Germany).

But being born 2001, that's a year younger than the two girls who won (Fran and Ali).

AND, of course, it's far harder, and less common, for the lads to beat men than for the girls to beat women.

(And I think Ryan will make it too, but that's maybe just me smile).



__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4  >  Last»  | Page of 4  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard